Is the price volatility risk in shrimp farming manageable and can profitability be sustained?
Aquaculture International, ISSN: 1573-143X, Vol: 33, Issue: 1
2025
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Shrimp price volatility vis-a-vis increased production costs puts the shrimp farmers in debt, reduces further investments, and threatens the sustainability of shrimp farming. The cost and price analysis using the time series data drawn from primary and secondary sources substantiated that the production cost per kg of shrimp has increased gradually whereas the corresponding prices reveal a declining trend across the years. Further analyses indicated that shrimp price instability was higher for the largely supplied 21–30 g shrimp size vis-a-vis small- (15–20 g) and large-sized shrimps (> 30 g) over a period of time. Moreover, price trend scrutiny revealed that the price of small- and large-sized shrimps were higher in January, February, September and November months across the years. Likewise, higher price trends were observed in winter, spring, and monsoon seasons, whereas in summer, the price tended to decline. The ARIMA model fitted to predict the shrimp prices for the immediate future, forecasted an increasing price trend for 15 to 20 g size shrimps. Therefore, market based farming with phase-wise stocking of ponds with the adoption of on-farm nursery that would supply quality seed for a scattered stocking and produce different sized shrimps meeting the market demand is the prudent strategy to minimize the price risk. Similarly, partial harvesting of shrimps at 15 g size and its sale in the domestic markets could secure the investments made and continuing the crop for large size shrimps for the niche market would minimize the price risk and sustain the profitability. Further, insurance cover for shrimp price volatility and social capital development in the form of fish farmer producer organizations for collectively procuring inputs and sale of shrimps are suggested as strategies towards reducing the price risk and sustain the profitability of shrimp farming in India.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know