The effect of formulation variables on protein stability and integrity of a model IgG4 monoclonal antibody and translation to formulation of a model ScFv
Biotechnology Letters, ISSN: 1573-6776, Vol: 40, Issue: 1, Page: 33-46
2018
- 2Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Objectives: There are a number of blockbuster monoclonal antibodies on the market used for the treatment of a variety of diseases. Although the formulation of many antibodies is achieved in ‘platform’ formulations, some are so difficult to formulate that it can result in an inability to develop a finished drug product. Further, a large number of antibody-inspired or-based molecules are now being developed and assessed for biotherapeutic purposes and less is understood around the required active protein drug concentrations, excipients and additives required in final product formulations. Results: We investigated the effect of formulation variables (pH, buffer composition, glycine and NaCl concentration, time and temperature of accelerated stability studies) on antibody solubility/aggregation and activity using a Plackett–Burman Experimental Design approach. We then used the findings from this study and applied these to the formulation of a single chain variable fragment (ScFv) molecule. Our data shows that prediction of ScFc stability from a model monoclonal antibody could be achieved although further formulation optimization was required. Mass spectrometry analysis confirmed changes to the mass and hence authenticity of both the model antibody and ScFv under formulation conditions that did not provide appropriate conditions for protection of the molecules. Conclusions: The role of the different formulation conditions on maintaining protein integrity is described and using mass spectrometry shows that protein integrity is compromised under particular conditions. The implications for predicting successful formulations for protein molecules is discussed and how antibody formulations could be used to predict formulation components for novel antibody based molecules.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029773781&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2443-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28939995; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10529-017-2443-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2443-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10529-017-2443-x
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know