PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS): a proposal for the long-term coordinated survey and monitoring of native island forest biota

Biodiversity and Conservation, ISSN: 1572-9710, Vol: 27, Issue: 10, Page: 2567-2586
2018
  • 83
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 176
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 61
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    83
    • Citation Indexes
      83
  • Captures
    176
  • Social Media
    61
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      61
      • Facebook
        61

Article Description

Islands harbour evolutionary and ecologically unique biota, which are currently disproportionately threatened by a multitude of anthropogenic factors, including habitat loss, invasive species and climate change. Native forests on oceanic islands are important refugia for endemic species, many of which are rare and highly threatened. Long-term monitoring schemes for those biota and ecosystems are urgently needed: (i) to provide quantitative baselines for detecting changes within island ecosystems, (ii) to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation and management actions, and (iii) to identify general ecological patterns and processes using multiple island systems as repeated ‘natural experiments’. In this contribution, we call for a Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS) for monitoring the remaining native island forests, using bryophytes, vascular plants, selected groups of arthropods and vertebrates as model taxa. As a basis for the GIMS, we also present new, optimized monitoring protocols for bryophytes and arthropods that were developed based on former standardized inventory protocols. Effective inventorying and monitoring of native island forests will require: (i) permanent plots covering diverse ecological gradients (e.g. elevation, age of terrain, anthropogenic disturbance); (ii) a multiple-taxa approach that is based on standardized and replicable protocols; (iii) a common set of indicator taxa and community properties that are indicative of native island forests’ welfare, building on, and harmonized with existing sampling and monitoring efforts; (iv) capacity building and training of local researchers, collaboration and continuous dialogue with local stakeholders; and (v) long-term commitment by funding agencies to maintain a global network of native island forest monitoring plots.

Bibliographic Details

Paulo A. V. Borges; Pedro Cardoso; Holger Kreft; Robert J. Whittaker; Simone Fattorini; Brent C. Emerson; Artur Gil; Rosemary G. Gillespie; Thomas J. Matthews; Ana M. C. Santos; Manuel J. Steinbauer; Christophe Thébaud; Claudine Ah-Peng; Isabel R. Amorim; Silvia Calvo Aranda; Ana Moura Arroz; José Manuel N. Azevedo; Mário Boieiro; Luís Borda-de-Água; José Carlos Carvalho; Rui B. Elias; José María Fernández-Palacios; Margarita Florencio; Juana M. González-Mancebo; Lawrence R. Heaney; Joaquín Hortal; Christoph Kueffer; Benoit Lequette; José Luis Martín-Esquivel; Heriberto López; Lucas Lamelas-López; José Marcelino; Rui Nunes; Pedro Oromí; Jairo Patiño; Antonio J. Pérez; Carla Rego; Sérvio P. Ribeiro; François Rigal; Pedro Rodrigues; Andrew J. Rominger; Margarida Santos-Reis; Hanno Schaefer; Cecília Sérgio; Artur R. M. Serrano; Manuela Sim-Sim; P. J. Stephenson; António O. Soares; Dominique Strasberg; Alain Vanderporten; Virgílio Vieira; Rosalina Gabriel

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Environmental Science

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know