Transcriptomic response of Enterococcus faecalis to iron excess
BioMetals, ISSN: 0966-0844, Vol: 25, Issue: 4, Page: 737-747
2012
- 23Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef13
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Iron is an essential nutrient for sustaining bacterial growth; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that govern gene expression during the homeostatic response to iron availability. In this study we analyzed the global transcriptional response of Enterococcus faecalis to a non-toxic iron excess in order to identify the set of genes that respond to an increment of intracellular iron. Our results showed an up-regulation of transcriptional regulators of the Fur family (PerR and ZurR), the cation efflux family (CzcD) and ferredoxin, while proton-dependent Mn/Fe (MntH) transporters and the universal stress protein (UspA) were down-regulated. This indicated that E. faecalis was able to activate a transcriptional response while growing in the presence of an excess of non-toxic iron, assuring the maintenance of iron homeostasis. Gene expression analysis of E. faecalis treated with H2O2 indicated that a fraction of the transcriptional changes induced by iron appears to be mediated by oxidative stress. A comparison of our transcriptomic data with a recently reported set of differentially expressed genes in E. faecalis grown in blood, revealed an important fraction of common genes. In particular, genes associated to oxidative stress were up-regulated in both conditions, while genes encoding the iron uptake system (feo and ycl operons) were up-regulated when cells were grown in blood. This suggested that blood cultures mimic an iron deficit, and was corroborated by measuring feo and ycl expression in E. faecalis treated with the iron chelating agent 2,2-dipyridil. In summary, our group identified an adaptive transcriptional mechanism in response to metal ion stress in E. faecalis, providing a foundation for future in-depth functional studies of the iron-activated regulatory network. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864912081&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22447126; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know