Revised model of calcium and magnesium binding to the bacterial cell wall
BioMetals, ISSN: 1572-8773, Vol: 27, Issue: 6, Page: 1361-1370
2014
- 90Citations
- 133Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations90
- Citation Indexes90
- 90
- CrossRef36
- Captures133
- Readers133
- 133
Article Description
Metals bind to the bacterial cell wall, yet the binding mechanisms and affinity constants are not fully understood. The cell wall of gram positive bacteria is characterized by a thick layer of peptidoglycan and anionic teichoic acids anchored in the cytoplasmic membrane as lipoteichoic acid or covalently bound to the cell wall as wall teichoic acid. The polyphosphate groups of teichoic acid provide one-half of the metal binding sites for calcium and magnesium, which contradicts previous reports that calcium binding is 100 % dependent on teichoic acid. The remaining binding sites are formed with the carboxyl units of peptidoglycan. In this work we report equilibrium association constants and total metal binding capacities for the interaction of calcium and magnesium ions with the bacterial cell wall. Metal binding is much stronger than previously reported. Curvature of Scatchard plots fromthe binding data and the resulting two regions of binding affinity suggest the presence of negative cooperative binding, which means that the binding affinity decreases as more ions become bound to the sample. For Ca, Region I has a K = (1.0 ± 0.2) × 10 M and Region II has a K = (0.075 ± 0.058) × 10 M. For Mg, K = (1.5 ± 0.1) × 10 and K = (0.17 ± 0.10) × 10. A binding capacity (η) is reported for both regions. However, since binding is still occurring in Region II, the total binding capacity is denoted by η, which are 0.70 ± 0.04 and 0.67 ± 0.03 μmol/mg for Ca and Mg respectively. These data contradict the current paradigm of only a single metal affinity value that is constant over a range of concentrations. We also find that measurement of equilibrium binding constants is highly sample dependent. This suggests a role for diffusion of metals through heterogeneous cell wall fragments. As a result, we are able to reconcile many contradictory theories that describe binding affinity and the binding mode of divalent metal cations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84911900432&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-014-9797-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315444; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10534-014-9797-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-014-9797-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10534-014-9797-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know