Characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis of microinvasive breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, ISSN: 1573-7217, Vol: 206, Issue: 3, Page: 495-507
2024
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures8
- Readers8
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Young Onset Breast Cancer: A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Based on DCE-MRI
Introduction Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy affecting women worldwide, with a significant trend toward the increasing incidence of early-onset breast cancer—defined as cases
Article Description
Purpose: To select patients who would benefit most from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by investigating the characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC). Methods: This retrospective study included 1688 patients with MIBC who underwent breast surgery with axillary staging at the Asan Medical Center from 1995 to 2020. Results: Most patients underwent SLNB alone (83.5%). Seventy (4.1%) patients were node-positive, and the majority had positive lymph nodes < 10 mm, with micro-metastases occurring frequently (n = 37; 55%). Node-positive patients underwent total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) more than breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and SLNB compared with node-negative patients (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of ALNM included young age [odds ratio (OR) 0.959; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.927–0.993; p = 0.019], ALND (OR 11.486; 95% CI 5.767–22.877; p < 0.001), number of lymph nodes harvested (≥ 5) (OR 3.184; 95% CI 1.555–6.522; p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (OR 6.831; 95% CI 2.386–19.557; p < 0.001), presence of multiple microinvasion foci (OR 2.771; 95% CI 1.329–5.779; p = 0.007), prominent lymph nodes in preoperative imaging (OR 2.675; 95% CI 1.362–5.253; p = 0.004), and hormone receptor positivity (OR 2.491; 95% CI 1.230–5.046; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Low ALNM rate (4.1%) suggests that routine SLNB for patients with MIBC is unnecessary but can be valuable for patients with specific risk factors. Ongoing trials for omitting SLNB in early breast cancer, and further subanalyses focusing on rare populations with MIBC are necessary.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191190560&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07305-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38658448; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-024-07305-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07305-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-024-07305-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know