Two-dimensional speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain in high-sensitivity troponin-negative low-risk patients with unstable angina: a “resting ischemia test”?
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, ISSN: 1573-0743, Vol: 34, Issue: 4, Page: 561-568
2018
- 17Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef1
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
With the introduction of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTNI) assays, the clinical significance unstable angina (UA) has become uncertain. We hypothesized that impaired left ventricular (LV) two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE)-derived peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) was able to exclude the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in UA patients without prior cardiovascular (CV) events and with a normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF). From a cohort of 200 patients admitted with UA, we selected 61 patients without prior CV events and with a normal LVEF; of these, 48 (79%) underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and 24 (39%) had at least ≥ 1 significant stenosis. 2D-STE LV GLS analysis was performed offline using a dedicated automated software program. The mean patient age was 61 ± 12 years and 66% were male. Among the 48 patients selected to undergo ICA, those without significant CAD had a better 2D-STE GLS (− 19.4 vs. − 15.9%, P < 0.001). A cutoff of − 17.5% had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 82% for differentiating UA patients without significant stenosis (AUC 0.86, P < 0.001). Patients who did not undergo ICA had a better GLS (− 20.2 vs. − 17.7%, P = 0.017). 2D-STE GLS had a significantly better discriminative power compared with LVEF (P < 0.001) and the GRACE score (P < 0.001) for identifying patients with significant CAD. Impaired values of 2D-STE LV GLS were significantly associated with the presence of CAD in hsTnI-negative UA patients and demonstrated better discriminative power than LVEF and the GRACE score.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033495486&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1269-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29128888; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-017-1269-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1269-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10554-017-1269-x
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know