Identification of subclinical myocardial dysfunction by Speckle Tracking Imaging in patients with myocardial infarction with non-occlusive coronary arteries (MINOCA)
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, ISSN: 1573-0743, Vol: 38, Issue: 10, Page: 2099-2106
2022
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef1
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients diagnosed with myocardial infarction with non-occlusive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Methods: Thirty-five patients with MINOCA (average age 54.26 ± 12.24 years) and thirty-five patients with ischemia with non-obstructed coronary artery disease (INOCA) (average age 55.20 ± 8.36 years) were enrolled in the study. All clinical conditions that could affect left ventricular functions were considered exclusion criteria. Echocardiographic studies were conducted in the patient and control groups in the left lateral decubitus position using a medical ultrasound device (EPIQ 7, Philips Medical System, USA). The left ventricle was examined longitudinally with apical images of chamber 4-3-2 using the available software (QLAB 6.0). Results: There were no differences in age, blood pressure level, baseline echocardiogram measurements, and tissue Doppler parameters between the two groups. In two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) measurements, left ventricular longitudinal strain and strain rate in systole, early and late diastole from apical 4-3-2 chamber and global measurements of each parameter were significantly decreased in the MINOCA group compared to the INOCA group (p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was observed between the global longitudinal strain rate and the troponin I in the MINOCA patients group (r=-0.43 p = 0.009). Conclusions: Our study showed that while standard echocardiographic parameters for patients diagnosed with MINOCA were normal, their left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions were reduced by the 2D-STE method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135763630&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02602-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726472; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-022-02602-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02602-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10554-022-02602-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know