Introducing time series snippets: a new primitive for summarizing long time series
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, ISSN: 1573-756X, Vol: 34, Issue: 6, Page: 1713-1743
2020
- 11Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The first question a data analyst asks when confronting a new dataset is often, “Show me some representative/typical data.” Answering this question is simple in many domains, with random samples or aggregate statistics of some kind. Surprisingly, it is difficult for large time series datasets. The major difficulty is not time or space complexity, but defining what it means to be representative data for this data type. In this work, we show that the obvious candidate definitions: motifs, shapelets, cluster centers, random samples etc., are all poor choices. We introduce time series snippets, a novel representation of typical time series subsequences. Informally, time series snippets can be seen as the answer to the following question. If a user, which could be a human or a higher-level algorithm, only has resources (including human time) to inspect k subsequences of a long time series, which k subsequences should be chosen? Beyond their utility for visualizing and summarizing massive time series collections, we show that time series snippets have utility for high-level comparison of large time series collections.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087440344&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10618-020-00702-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know