PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Acceptability and Adequacy of a Non-endoscopic Cell Collection Device for Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus: Lessons Learned

Digestive Diseases and Sciences, ISSN: 1573-2568, Vol: 67, Issue: 1, Page: 177-186
2022
  • 6
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 12
    Captures
  • 22
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Lucid Diagnostics Chairman & CEO, Dr. Lishan Aklog, Highlights EsoCheck® Esophageal Cell Collection Device during Congressional Testimony

Contrasts EsoCheck's powerful cell collection capabilities to "cruder, decades-old" technologies during comments on patient access to medical technology innovation NEW YORK, Feb. 15, 2024 /PRNewswire/

Article Description

Background: Endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is common, costly, and underperformed in at-risk people. A non-endoscopic cell collection device can be used to collect esophageal cells, enabling BE screening. Aims: This study assessed the acceptability and adequacy of a commercial non-endoscopic cell collection device in a US population. Methods: Six sites enrolled patients with confirmed BE or heartburn/regurgitation for ≥ 6 months. Patients underwent administration of the device, consisting of a sponge encapsulated in a capsule. The capsule dwelled in the stomach for 7.5 min and was retracted via an attached suture. An adequate sample was ≥ 1 columnar cell by H&E staining. Sample quality was rated using a 0–5 scale, with 0 = no columnar cells and 5 = plentiful groups. Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3) staining was performed. Accuracy was assessed using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/biopsy as the gold standard. Results: Of 191 patients, 99.5% successfully swallowed the device. Overall sample adequacy was 91% (171/188), with 84% (158/188) high quality. The detachment rate was 2/190 (1%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay with TFF3 staining were 76%, 77%, and 76%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for ≥ 3 cm BE were 86%, 77%, and 82%. Asked if willing to repeat the procedure, 93% would, and 65% indicated a preference for the device over EGD. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a high rate of sample adequacy and promising acceptability of this non-endoscopic sampling device in a US population. Diagnostic characteristics suggest that non-endoscopic assessment of BE deserves further development as an alternative to endoscopy.

Bibliographic Details

Shaheen, Nicholas J; Komanduri, Srinadh; Muthusamy, V Raman; Wani, Sachin; O'Donovan, Maria; Kaushal, Rajinder; Haydek, John M

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know