Understanding Students' Resistance to Continue Using Online Learning
Education and Information Technologies, ISSN: 1573-7608, Vol: 29, Issue: 5, Page: 5421-5446
2024
- 5Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Previous Online Learning (OL) studies have provided significant insights into why students would adopt or use OL but far less attention has been directed towards understanding why they would reject or resist continuing to use OL. The capability of OL to simulate the learning process to be equivalent to classroom learning remains an unresolved theoretical and pragmatic conundrum. This study is conducted to investigate the factors that affect students’ resistance to continue using OL and proposes a novel model based on the Process Virtualization Theory (PVT). The PVT investigates the amenability or the resistance of a process to be migrated from the physical to the virtual environment and can predict whether a process is conducive to or resistive to being carried out virtually. The study model was validated using structural equation modeling against data obtained from 563 undergraduate students through an online survey. The results revealed that sensory requirements, relationship requirements, synchronism requirements, and monitoring capability significantly increase students’ resistance to continue use OL. A significant negative impact of representation capability on students’ resistance to using OL was found while reach capability impact was insignificant. The significant factors collectively explain 71.6 % of the variance in students’ resistance. The study is among the first that concentrates on students’ resistance, in which it defies the predominant focus on students’ adoption or use in OL literature. The practically application of PVT contributes to enrich both academics and practitioners insights into a novel set of factors that affect students’ resistance that are rarely considered in the context of OL, particularly during the later stages of OL implementation.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know