Databases and Applications of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model in Brazilian River Basins: a Review
Environmental Modeling and Assessment, ISSN: 1573-2967
2024
- 2Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Hydrological models are used to assess natural and man-made changes in watersheds worldwide. Proper input data collection and handling are essential to reduce simulation uncertainty. Thus, this study reviews the sources of physical and hydroclimatic data, used in the last 5 years, from 55 articles that applied the SWAT model in Brazil. Most studies took place in the Atlantic Forest biome (20), followed by Cerrado (14), Amazon (11), and Caatinga (10). Worth noting that there are no studies published in the Pantanal and Pampa biomes. National databases (INPE, INMET, EMPRAPA, and ANA) are the most used in data acquisition process, followed by regional databases, more applied in smaller basins. Global databases are more sought after in studies of large basins due to their low spatial resolution. National climate data have low spatial density and are only available in five states at the regional level, so satellite data and reanalysis are viable alternatives in regions with little climate monitoring. Future research directions include (1) evaluating and comparing available data, (2) using high-resolution imagery to map land use in small catchments, (3) expanding the model’s database of vegetation parameters to cover all classes identified in high-resolution images, (4) create a database at regional level in the states, (5) develop software to manage hydroclimatic information, and (6) continuously monitor the quality of water bodies.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know