Does the market-oriented environmental regulation promote firms’ technological innovation? Evidence from A-share listed companies in China
Environment, Development and Sustainability, ISSN: 1573-2975, Vol: 27, Issue: 1, Page: 1145-1174
2025
- 6Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Launched in 2013, China’s carbon emission trading system (ETS) pilot program is often known as a successful example of developing countries using market mechanisms to accomplish environmental targets. However, few scholars have evaluated the economic incentives from the point of view of enterprise innovation behavior completely. Based on the financial records and patent statistics of China’s A-share listed companies, this paper uses China’s ETS pilot as a quasi-natural experiment to test. The results show that ETS has a significant incentive effect on enterprises’ R&D behavior, and the elastic coefficient between them is about 0.0333. Besides, the “relaxation of financing constraint” and “exerting cost pressure” are important transmission mechanisms for ETS to exert the incentive effect. Further analysis shows that ETS also has a significant effect on the R&D strategy and preference of enterprises, which significantly improves the quality of R&D and the enthusiasm of enterprises to carry out “green innovation.” In addition, we also find that the policy effect of ETS varies with different ownership and industries. Unlike the opponents of ETS, this paper believes that ETS can be used as a fundamental policy tool for developing countries to allocate environmental resources and control economic transition.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know