Dealing with sources of variability in the data-analysis of phenotyping experiments with transgenic rice
Euphytica, ISSN: 0014-2336, Vol: 160, Issue: 3, Page: 325-337
2008
- 6Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The analysis of phenotyping experiments for transgenics deserves special attention. Experiments set up for the detection of interesting phenotypes among transgenic plants have to screen several primary events obtained by transforming with a particular transgene, since expression levels of the transgene differ considerably. Agronomically most interesting lines might have an intermediate level of transgene expression. Therefore, attention should be paid to all transformants and how their expression levels differ. Experimental design and the analysis of the data have to focus on the variability among lines and have to be able to detect small differences in quantitative traits. The mixed model is the most adequate approach to analyse data of phenotyping experiments because it reflects the structure and provides the researcher with important measures to allow broader inferences. The paper explains the model and illustrates it using a screening experiment carried out by the high-throughput phenotyping method of TraitMill. Besides inference for a particular experiment and a particular set of lines, the output allows more general predictions for a wider set of non-tested lines. It quantifies the various sources of variability encountered and helps to understand the underlying process. It also helps to optimise the experimental set-up of future experiments. The model presented here has been implemented in the R-language and SAS. The scripts are attached. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41049112316&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10681-007-9526-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know