Distinguishing perceptual and conceptual levels of recognition at group boundaries
Evolutionary Ecology, ISSN: 1573-8477, Vol: 29, Issue: 2, Page: 205-215
2015
- 9Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Communication is central to accomplishing the tasks of life, coordinating activities like mating, feeding, fighting, and flocking. To be successful, these tasks are often restricted to members of an individual’s own evolutionary lineage, or conspecifics. The ability to recognize conspecifics is often termed “species recognition.” Here, I summarize the difficulties associated with the concept of species recognition and describe a perceptual–conceptual framework for considering the processes by which organisms recognize members of a particular group. Recently published studies that focus on species recognition are highlighted and discussed in light of that framework, and I conclude by articulating open and fundamental questions that arise from challenging earlier notions of species recognition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923642188&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10682-014-9748-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know