An Improved YOLOv5s Fire Detection Model
Fire Technology, ISSN: 1572-8099, Vol: 60, Issue: 1, Page: 135-166
2024
- 18Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
It is well-established that contact fire sensors are susceptible to interference from non-fire particles and cannot be applied to fire alarms in both large indoor and outdoor open spaces. On the other hand, the fire detection technology based on the image has several advantages including non-contact, fast response, strong anti-interference, unlimited application space, and comprehensive fire alarm information, which is preferable to fire detection. To this end, in this work, eight existing object detection models were first compared based on convolutional neural networks by autonomously collecting flame smoke datasets. From the acquired results, it was demonstrated that the YOLOv5 network has higher Mean Average Precision (mAP) and Frame Per Second (FPS) than the others. Next, further optimization of the YOLOv5s network was carried out. By introducing Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), replacing PANet with BiFPN, and replacing nearest neighbor interpolation with transposed convolution (TC), the accuracy of the YOLOv5s network was significantly improved. Simultaneously, three lightweight networks, namely MobileNetV3, ShuffleNetV2, and GhostNet, were used to lighten the YOLOv5s network. The validation results indicated that the mAP of the improved YOLOv5s model reached 82.1%, the parameters were as low as 5.9 M and the floating-point operations (FLOPs) dropped to 8.1G. Finally, Single Eye (SiEYE) and Double Eyes (DoEYE) detection networks were proposed for emergency conditions based on the above-mentioned improvements. From the test results, it was indicated that the network has stronger robustness and meets the fire detection requirements, which is of great importance for the next research on smoke diffusion prediction.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know