Alternative splicing, gene duplication and connectivity in the genetic interaction network of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetica, ISSN: 0016-6707, Vol: 134, Issue: 2, Page: 181-186
2008
- 12Citations
- 32Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 11
- CrossRef9
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
The Evolutionary Relationship between Alternative Splicing and Gene Duplication
Before the human genome was sequenced it was widely believed that the human genome would encode around 100,000 genes based on an estimate of the number of different proteins existing in human cells. Surprisingly only ∼21,000 coding genes were annotated in the genome sequence. Almost all protein coding genes from eukaryotes contain non-coding sequences, known as introns, flanked by coding sequences
Article Description
We examined the relationship between gene duplication, alternative splicing, and connectedness in a predicted genetic interaction network using published data from the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans. Similar to previous results from mammals, genes belonging to families with only one member ("singletons") were significantly more likely to lack alternative splicing than were members of large multi-gene families. Genes belonging to multi-gene families lacking alternative splicing tended to have higher connectedness in the genetic interaction network than did genes in families that included one or more alternatively spliced members. Moreover, alternatively spliced genes were significantly more likely to interact with other alternatively spliced genes. These results support the hypothesis that certain key proteins with high degrees of network connectedness are subject to selection opposing the occurrence of alternatively spliced forms. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=48449089040&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18026854; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know