A matter-dominated cosmological model with variable G and Λ and its confrontation with observational data
General Relativity and Gravitation, ISSN: 0001-7701, Vol: 44, Issue: 10, Page: 2477-2501
2012
- 7Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the framework of renormalization-group improved cosmologies, we analyze both theoretically and observationally the exact and general solution of the matter-dominated cosmological equations, by using the expression of the cosmological term as a function of the Newton parameter already determined by the integration method employed in a previous paper. A rough comparison between such a model and the concordance ΛCDM model from the point of view of the magnitude-redshift relationship has been already considered, without showing any appreciable differences. Here we test our model by using astrophysical data (the Union2 type Ia supernovae (SNIa) dataset, the Hubble diagram constructed from some gamma ray bursts luminosity distance indicator), to constrain its parameters. We also apply a cosmographic approach to our cosmological model. In order to estimate the cosmographic parameters we fit a large dataset, including not only the Hubble diagram, as traced by SNIa and gamma ray bursts, but also the H(z) measurements from passively evolving galaxies, baryon acoustic oscillations and the distance priors from the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy spectrum. We show that this matter-dominated cosmological model with variable Newton parameter and variable cosmological term is indeed compatible with the observations above. The cosmographic approach adopted confirms such conclusions. Last, it seems possible to include radiation into the model, since numerical integration of the equations derived by the presence of both radiation and matter shows that, after inflation, the total density parameter is initially dominated by the radiation contribution and later by the matter one. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865705216&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5/fulltext.html; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10714-012-1409-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know