Why do East Asian students do so well in mathematics? A machine learning study
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, ISSN: 1573-1774, Vol: 21, Issue: 3, Page: 691-711
2023
- 22Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
East Asian students have consistently performed well in mathematics compared to their international peers. Though many researchers have attempted to explore the factors that underpin their success, most studies have focused only on a limited set of variables. Mathematics achievement, however, is a complex phenomenon, determined by multiple factors, and best understood when different variables across levels of analysis are taken into account. Guided by the socio-ecological theory, the present study attempts to understand the relative importance of individual, microsystem, and mesosystem factors in predicting mathematics achievement. We used the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2019 data provided by 21,340 eighth-grade East Asian students (Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, and Singapore), 1242 mathematics teachers, and 802 principals. Machine learning (i.e., random forest regression) was used to analyze the data. Results identified 11 key variables that best predicted East Asian students’ mathematics achievement. Among these, students’ confidence in mathematics, socioeconomic status, and school emphasis on academic success were the top three. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know