On the Interpretation of Near-Critical Gas–Liquid Heat Capacities
International Journal of Thermophysics, ISSN: 0195-928X, Vol: 38, Issue: 9
2017
- 9Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This comment is in response to a comment by Sengers and Anisimov on the article “Gibbs density surface of fluid argon” that contradicts prevailing theory. It has not “been established experimentally that the thermodynamic properties of fluids satisfy scaling laws with universal critical exponents asymptotically close to a single critical point of the vapor–liquid phase transition.” Here we explain why an apparent divergence of C, in historical experimental “evidence,” is based upon a misinterpretation of near-critical gas–liquid heat capacity measurements in the two-phase coexistence region. The conclusion that there is no “singular critical point” on Gibbs density surface still stands.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026319614&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10765-017-2277-8
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know