Automatic Speech Emotion Recognition: a Systematic Literature Review
International Journal of Speech Technology, ISSN: 1572-8110, Vol: 27, Issue: 1, Page: 267-285
2024
- 2Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Automatic Speech Emotion Recognition (ASER) has recently garnered attention across various fields including artificial intelligence, pattern recognition, and human–computer interaction. However, ASER encounters numerous challenges such as a shortage of diverse datasets, appropriate feature selection, and suitable intelligent recognition techniques. To address these challenges, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted following established guidelines. A total of 60 primary research papers spanning from 2011 to 2023 were reviewed to investigate, interpret, and analyze the related literature by addressing five key research questions. Despite being an emerging area with applications in real-life scenarios, ASER still grapples with limitations in existing techniques. This SLR provides a comprehensive overview of existing techniques, datasets, and feature extraction tools in the ASER domain, shedding light on the weaknesses of current research studies. Additionally, it outlines a list of limitations for consideration in future work.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know