Prospective microperimetry and OCT evaluation of efficacy of repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injections for persistent clinically significant diabetic macular edema
International Ophthalmology, ISSN: 0165-5701, Vol: 33, Issue: 3, Page: 261-267
2013
- 11Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef3
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
To prospectively investigate morphologic and functional changes after intravitreal bevacizumab for persistent diffuse and clinically significant diabetic macular edema. In total, 26 eyes in 26 patients were treated with three intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin™) given at 4-week intervals. Study parameters included: visual acuity (VA), perceived visual improvement, central macular thickness as measured by Spectralis OCT, macular sensitivity and fixation pattern as measured by MP-1 microperimetry, and the incidence of ocular and systemic side-effects. At the time of follow-up, 76.9 % of eyes showed a significant improvement in VA (p = 0.012), 38.4 % showed a one-line improvement on the ETDRS chart compared with VA at day 0, 30.7 % showed a two-line improvement, and 7.6 % showed at least a three-line improvement. The mean central macular thickness was 447 microns at day 0 and 311.1 microns at follow-up (p = 0.003). The mean baseline macular sensitivity, by MP-1 microperimetry, was 8.29 dB; at follow -up, macular sensitivity had improved to 14.26 dB (p = 0.025). These results support further controlled trials on the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab in treating diabetic macular edema. Microperimetry and OCT are important tools in managing diabetic patients, providing a detailed study of the macular region, particularly when it is necessary to monitor the morphological and functional outcome after various interventions. A good correlation between retinal sensitivity and perceived visual performance was found. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877926271&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9685-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242589; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-012-9685-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9685-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-012-9685-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know