Preoperative ocular coherence tomographic prognosticators of visual acuity after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery
International Ophthalmology, ISSN: 1573-2630, Vol: 42, Issue: 10, Page: 3243-3252
2022
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures4
- Readers4
Review Description
Purpose: To provide a current review of the evidence for the utility of preoperative ocular coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in prognosticating postoperative visual acuity and visual improvement after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. To determine which OCT bio-markers are most useful in this regard and where future studies may apply more emphasis. Methods: An extensive search of the PubMed database was performed for studies investigating this relationship. Key search terms included: idiopathic, epiretinal membrane, surgery, peel, vitrectomy, vision, outcomes, visual acuity, ocular coherence tomography, central foveal thickness, foveal contour, foveal morphology, ectopic inner foveal layers, inner retinal layers, inner retinal irregularity index, outer retinal layers, ellipsoid zone, interdigitation zone, photoreceptor outer segment length, central bouquet abnormality, staging, choroidoscleral irregularity, ganglion cell and nerve fibre layers, inner and outer plexiform layers, inner and outer nuclear layers. Forty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included in this review. These consisted of 28 retrospective studies [1–3,13,16–18,20,23–29,32–36,38,40,42–47], 17 prospective studies[6–12,14,19,21,22,30,31,37,41,48,49], 2 reviews [4,39] and 2 systematic reviews [5,15]. Conclusion: The weight of literary evidence seems to support photoreceptor integrity as the most consistent OCT marker of better postoperative visual acuity. This includes analysis of ellipsoid and interdigitation zones as well as photoreceptor outer segment length. However, the newer OCT staging system proposed by Govetto et al. (2017) fulfils a need for a clinically useful and evidence-based OCT classification. It may be the way forward in prognosticating ERM surgical outcomes by preoperative stratification. There is insufficient evidence to suggest the other discussed parameters in this review as useful prognosticators of postoperative visual acuity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130291875&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02317-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35583682; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-022-02317-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02317-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-022-02317-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know