Dynamics of Negative Evaluations in the Information Exchange of Interactive Decision-Making Teams: Advancing the Design of Technology-Augmented GDSS
Information Systems Frontiers, ISSN: 1572-9419, Vol: 23, Issue: 6, Page: 1621-1642
2021
- 3Citations
- 3Usage
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Applications of technology that contribute to managing decision-making teams for their objectives benefit from an explicit account of microprocessing in the information exchange of team members. While negative evaluations are well recognized as a key information type in this exchange, the micro-processing that underlies its exchange has not been well defined. Negative evaluations will be proposed to differ from other information types because of their dual properties as information and affect. We propose dynamics that are implied by the duality in negative evaluations we cite and report empirical studies that test abstract generalizations on the proposed dynamics. We then give an explicit form to exchange of negative evaluations in a numerical model of information exchange and use the model in exercises that directly demonstrate the proposed properties of negative evaluations in information exchange. Finally, we review contributions that the discourse offers to the design of AI-supported GDSSs for managerial objectives in the exchange of information in ill-structured decision making and introduce architecture of a prototype GDSS that implements quality-maximizing information exchange. Directions for subsequent study are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091172429&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10063-y; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10063-y; https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/faculty_rsca/2922; https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3921&context=faculty_rsca; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10063-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-020-10063-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know