Flexibility; a critical concern in concept development in the early stages of architectural design process (case study: universities in Tehran)
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, ISSN: 1573-1804, Vol: 34, Issue: 4, Page: 1463-1489
2024
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Academic design pedagogy in the early stages of design is crucial and complicated. The complicated stems from the diverse aspect of architectural design. The world of values, opinions, and ideas begins the architectural design process, and junior architecture students strive to express their ideas in the language of architectural forms. Transforming and actually translating ideas into form is one of the biggest challenges that juniors face. According to the experience of preliminary design studio 3, the concept phase as a translation or transition stage from idea to form and flexibility as a basic approach were investigated in this phase. In this research, three methods used by junior architecture students in three design studios were compared with each other. The results of the pretest–posttest methodology demonstrated that only 15% of students in Studio A, who utilized the two-step process (idea-form) were able to create the desired form, while 55% of students in Studio B (idea-concept-form) and 95% of students in Studio C (idea-flexibility in concept-form) successfully achieved it. The comparison of the three processes shows that the three-phases process, which used the flexibility approach in the concept phase to develop the idea and create the form, is the most efficient method in the early stages of architectural design for architectural juniors.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know