PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Water polluted with glyphosate formulations: Effectiveness of a decontamination process using Chlorella vulgaris growing as bioindicator

Journal of Applied Phycology, ISSN: 1573-5176, Vol: 28, Issue: 4, Page: 2279-2286
2016
  • 21
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 49
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 20
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    21
    • Citation Indexes
      21
  • Captures
    49
  • Social Media
    20
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      20
      • Facebook
        20

Article Description

The environmental pollution caused by pesticides is considered a major problem worldwide. Glyphosate is one of the herbicides most widely used, and its use has increased sharply in the last years. In this work, the toxicity of four commercial glyphosate formulations (Eskoba®, Panzer Gold®, Roundup Ultramax® and Sulfosato Touchdown®) was assessed by determining the median effective concentration at 96 h (96 h-EC) using the microalga Chlorella vulgaris as the biological model. Although the formulations tested are moderately to slightly toxic to C. vulgaris according to the World Health Organization’s toxicity categories for aquatic and terrestrial organisms, this research shows that the four formulations are toxic, with Eskoba® the least toxic and Roundup Ultramax® the most toxic one. A UV/HO remediation process for the detoxification of the samples was tested also. Its effectiveness was evaluated using a C. vulgaris growth inhibition test. Growth inhibition of C. vulgaris did not reach 18.2 %, indicating the efficacy of the UV/HO remediation process to reduce glyphosate toxicity. In some of the samples tested within the first 48 h of the assay, C. vulgaris growth was even increased. The results of the present work suggest that the selected species was a good indicator to determine the toxicity level of glyphosate formulations and shows the relevance of the ecotoxicological tests to evaluate a physicochemical remediation process.

Bibliographic Details

Ulises Reno; Luciana Regaldo; Ana María Gagneten; Eduardo Vidal; Melisa Mariani; Cristina Zalazar

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know