Water polluted with glyphosate formulations: Effectiveness of a decontamination process using Chlorella vulgaris growing as bioindicator
Journal of Applied Phycology, ISSN: 1573-5176, Vol: 28, Issue: 4, Page: 2279-2286
2016
- 21Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The environmental pollution caused by pesticides is considered a major problem worldwide. Glyphosate is one of the herbicides most widely used, and its use has increased sharply in the last years. In this work, the toxicity of four commercial glyphosate formulations (Eskoba®, Panzer Gold®, Roundup Ultramax® and Sulfosato Touchdown®) was assessed by determining the median effective concentration at 96 h (96 h-EC) using the microalga Chlorella vulgaris as the biological model. Although the formulations tested are moderately to slightly toxic to C. vulgaris according to the World Health Organization’s toxicity categories for aquatic and terrestrial organisms, this research shows that the four formulations are toxic, with Eskoba® the least toxic and Roundup Ultramax® the most toxic one. A UV/HO remediation process for the detoxification of the samples was tested also. Its effectiveness was evaluated using a C. vulgaris growth inhibition test. Growth inhibition of C. vulgaris did not reach 18.2 %, indicating the efficacy of the UV/HO remediation process to reduce glyphosate toxicity. In some of the samples tested within the first 48 h of the assay, C. vulgaris growth was even increased. The results of the present work suggest that the selected species was a good indicator to determine the toxicity level of glyphosate formulations and shows the relevance of the ecotoxicological tests to evaluate a physicochemical remediation process.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know