Bee and wasp responses to a fragmented landscape in southern Brazil
Journal of Insect Conservation, ISSN: 1572-9753, Vol: 18, Issue: 6, Page: 1193-1201
2014
- 17Citations
- 105Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The available studies on Hymenoptera assemblages in fragmented landscapes have shown that these insects are sensitive to fragmentation, besides some different conclusions which are possibly linked to different landscape attributes and sampling designs. The present objective is to determine the correlation among the descriptors of bees and wasps assemblages with fragment predictors (size, connectivity and edge effect) within a fragmented landscape of Semidecidual Seasonal Forest (Paraná State, Brazil). For this purpose five forest fragments, from three to 484 hectares, were sampled during a year, summing up 480 samples of baited traps and 3,480 of bowl traps. We have found that abundance of Apinae and oligolectic bees increase and the richness of Augochlorini bees decreases with increasing fragment size. Connectivity has positively influenced bee richness and edge effect has positively influenced the abundance of oligoletic bees. Orchid bees also respond to the site predictors, especially for the Eufriesea violacea, which abundance was positively correlated with fragment size and connectivity, however negatively with edge effect, and Eufriesea nigrita which abundance was negatively correlated with fragment size, but positively with edge effect. Composition of bees, Crabronidae and Pompilidae wasps were influenced by fragment size. Plebeia droryana and Tetrapedia diversipes could be considered as indicators, according to their sensitiveness to habitat predictors. Our results are congruent with previous studies which found that bees are sensitive to landscape fragmentation, we suggest that the group be used in ecological indicator and monitoring studies.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know