Characterization of the binding of flavanone hesperetin with chicken egg lysozyme using spectroscopic techniques: Effect of pH on the binding
Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, ISSN: 1573-1111, Vol: 84, Issue: 1-2, Page: 21-34
2015
- 28Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The interaction between hesperetin and hen egg lysozyme has been investigated using UV-vis, steady-state fluorescence, synchronous fluorescence, three dimensional (3D) fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD) and molecular docking studies. The structural characteristics of hesperetin are monitored at different pH conditions (5.4, 6.4, 7.0, 7.4, 8.0, 8.4 and 9.0) and its binding affinity towards lysozyme is also determined using fluorescence study. It has been found that binding constant increased from pH 5.4 (0.154 × 10 M) to pH 7.0 (1.943 × 10 M), followed by a decreasing trend from pH 7.0 to 9.0 (1.293 × 10 M). The number of binding sites for hesperetin in lysozyme is estimated to be 1.394 ± 0.128 and negative δG (-23.345 ± 2.231 kJ mol) indicates the spontaneous nature of binding. Spectrofluorimetric analyses rationalized that the static quenching mechanism is present in the binding and the reason behind the upward curvature nature of Stern-Volmer plots are also discussed. The binding distance between lysozyme and hesperetin has been estimated according to Förster’s theory and a possibility of non-radiative energy transfer from lysozyme to hesperetin is observed. Synchronous and 3D fluorescence studies indicate that hesperetin binding induced apparent structural perturbation in lysozyme and it increased α-helicity of lysozyme by ~ 4 % (CD results). The interaction of hesperetin with lysozyme decreased the enzymatic activity of lysozyme and revealed the affinity of hesperetin towards the active site of lysozyme. Molecular docking study reveals that hesperetin prefers to bind in the close proximity of Trp 62 and Trp 63 and it is vital for catalytic activity of lysozyme.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979265940&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10847-015-0578-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know