A nomenclature and data model to describe NMR experiments
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, ISSN: 0925-2738, Vol: 36, Issue: 3, Page: 147-155
2006
- 16Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef11
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
Despite ongoing efforts in organising NMR information, there is no consistent and well-described generic standard for naming NMR experiments. The main reason for the absence of a universal naming system is that the information content of the coherence pathways is difficult to describe in full detail. We propose a system that describes the common and generic elements of the coherence pathways produced by pulse sequences. The system itself is formalised by an 'NMR experiment protocol' model, which is described in the Universal Modelling Language (UML) as part of the CCPN data model. Furthermore, normalized experiment names can be derived from this proposed model. We hope this article will stimulate discussion to organise the wealth of NMR experiments, and that by bringing this discussion into the public domain we can improve and expand our proposed system to include as much information and as many NMR experiments as possible. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33750980685&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17031528; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10858-006-9076-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know