Revisiting biomolecular NMR spectroscopy for promoting small-molecule drug discovery
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, ISSN: 1573-5001, Vol: 74, Issue: 10-11, Page: 501-508
2020
- 9Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef5
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Recently, there has been increasing interest in new modalities such as therapeutic antibodies and gene therapy at a number of pharmaceutical companies. Moreover, in small-molecule drug discovery at such companies, efforts have focused on hard-to-drug targets such as inhibiting protein–protein interactions. Biomolecular NMR spectroscopy has been used in drug discovery in a variety of ways, such as for the reliable detection of binding and providing three-dimensional structural information for structure-based drug design. The advantages of using NMR spectroscopy have been known for decades (Jahnke in J Biomol NMR 39:87–90, (2007); Gossert and Jahnke in Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 97:82–125, (2016)). For tackling hard-to-drug targets and increasing the success in discovering drug molecules, in-depth analysis of drug–target protein interactions performed by biophysical methods will be more and more essential. Here, we review the advantages of NMR spectroscopy as a key technology of biophysical methods and also discuss issues such as using cutting-edge NMR spectrometers and increasing the demand of utilizing conformational dynamics information for promoting small-molecule drug discovery.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083501042&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-020-00314-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306215; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10858-020-00314-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-020-00314-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10858-020-00314-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know