Efficiently driving protein-based fragment screening and lead discovery using two-dimensional NMR
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, ISSN: 1573-5001, Vol: 77, Issue: 1-2, Page: 39-53
2023
- 2Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) and validation of small molecule binders using NMR spectroscopy is an established and widely used method in the early stages of drug discovery. Starting from a library of small compounds, ligand- or protein-observed NMR methods are employed to detect binders, typically weak, that become the starting points for structure–activity relationships (SAR) by NMR. Unlike the more frequently used ligand-observed 1D NMR techniques, protein-observed 2D H-N or H-C heteronuclear correlation (HSQC or HMQC) methods offer insights that include the mechanism of ligand engagement on the target and direct binding affinity measurements in addition to routine screening. We hereby present the development of a set of software tools within the MestReNova (Mnova) package for analyzing 2D NMR for FBDD and hit validation purposes. The package covers three main tasks: (1) unsupervised profiling of raw data to identify outlier data points to exclude in subsequent analyses; (2) batch processing of single-point spectra to identify and rank binders based on chemical shift perturbations or spectral peak intensity changes; and (3) batch processing of multiple titration series to derive binding affinities (K) by tracing the changes in peak locations or measuring global spectral changes. Toward this end, we implemented and evaluated a set of algorithms for automated peak tracing, spectral binning, and variance analysis by PCA, and a new tool for spectral data intensity comparison using ECHOS. The accuracy and speed of the tools are demonstrated on 2D NMR binding data collected on ligands used in the development of potential inhibitors of the anti-apoptotic MCL-1 protein. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143810365&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-022-00410-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512150; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10858-022-00410-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-022-00410-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10858-022-00410-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know