Clinical performance of lung ultrasound in predicting time-dependent changes in lung aeration in ARDS patients
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, ISSN: 1573-2614, Vol: 37, Issue: 2, Page: 473-480
2023
- 3Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To evaluate whether lung ultrasound is reliable bedside tool to monitor changes of lung aeration at the early and late stages of ARDS. LUS was performed in ARDS patients that underwent at least two consecutive CT scan at ICU admission and at least 1 week after admission. Twelve fields were evaluated and graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation). Changes of LUS score in twelve fields (ΔLUS) and in four ventral (ΔLUS), intermediate (ΔLUS) and dorsal (ΔLUS) zones were calculated at each time points. Three categories were described: Improve (ΔLUS < 0), Equal (ΔLUS = 0) or Worse (ΔLUS > 0). LUS scores were correlated with total changes in lung CT aeration (ΔCT) and with normally, poorly and not aerated regions (ΔCT, ΔCT and ΔCT, respectively). Eleven patients were enrolled. ΔLUS had significant correlation with ΔCT (r = − 0.74, p < 0.01). ΔLUS, ΔLUS and ΔLUS showed significant correlations with ΔCT (r = − 0.66, r = − 0.69, r = − 0.63, respectively; p < 0.05). Compared to Equal, Improve and Worse categories had significantly higher (p < 0.01) and lower (p < 0.05) ΔCTair values, respectively. Compared to Equal, Improve and Worse categories had lower (p < 0.01) and higher (p < 0.01) ΔCT values, respectively. LUS score had a good correlation with lung CT in detecting changes of lung aeration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135713838&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00902-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939164; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10877-022-00902-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00902-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10877-022-00902-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know