Genome rearrangements with partially ordered chromosomes
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, ISSN: 1382-6905, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: 133-144
2006
- 4Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Genomic maps often do not specify the order within some groups of two or more markers. The synthesis of a master map from several sources introduces additional order ambiguity due to markers missing from some sources. We represent each chromosome as a partial order, summarized by a directed acyclic graph (DAG), to account for poor resolution and missing data. The genome rearrangement problem is then to infer a minimum number of translocations and reversals for transforming a set of linearizations, one for each chromosomal DAG in the genome of one species, to linearizations of the DAGs of another species. We augment each DAG to a directed graph (DG) in which all possible linearizations are embedded. The chromosomal DGs representing two genomes are combined to produce a single bicoloured graph. From this we extract a maximal decomposition into alternating coloured cycles, determining an optimal sequence of rearrangements. We test this approach on simulated partially ordered genomes and on marker data from maize and sorghum chromosomal maps. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646508755&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10878-006-7120-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know