Development of a 3D Motion Tracking System for the Analysis of Skills in Microsurgery
Journal of Medical Systems, ISSN: 1573-689X, Vol: 45, Issue: 12, Page: 106
2021
- 8Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
Microsurgical skills of trainee surgeons have been subjectively evaluated due to the lack of technological tools. The objective of this investigation is to present the construct validity of the mitracks3D, which is a system designed to help in the objective evaluation of microsurgery trainees. To achieve this, a stereoscopic vision system records the 3D motion of two tweezers manipulated by surgeons during microsurgery training. Using motion analysis parameters (MAPs), quantitative information about their microsurgical skills and performance is obtained. For validation, 14 participants were enrolled and divided into two groups: expert microsurgeons (3 female, 2 male) and trainee surgeons (4 female, 5 male). The 3D motion tracking was acquired while the surgeons practiced with two training models: transferring objects and suture. Twelve MAPs were used to objective assessment the skill levels of each participant. Subsequent, statistical analysis was computed to compare the scores of both groups. Validation results showed statistically significant differences in 8 of the 12 MAPs and in 10 of the 12 MAPs using the transferring and the suturing models, respectively. The capability of mitracks3D to differentiate the performance of microsurgeons by analyzing their movements was shown. The mitracks3D system was successfully validated. With this system was possible to differentiate the psychomotor microsurgical skills between the two groups of surgeons. The mitracks3D system is a suitable device for the evaluation of microsurgical skills in a variety of surgical specialties that require it during the training of their residents.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118749753&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34731325; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know