Assessment of DCE–MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically–based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, ISSN: 1573-8744, Vol: 43, Issue: 5, Page: 529-547
2016
- 8Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE–MRI) is used for detailed characterization of pathology of lesions sites, such as brain tumors, by quantitative analysis of tracer’s data through the use of pharmacokinetic (PK) models. A key component for PK models in DCE–MRI is the estimation of the concentration–time profile of the tracer in a nearby vessel, referred as Arterial Input Function (AIF). The aim of this work was to assess through full body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model approaches the PK profile of gadoteric acid (Gd-DOTA) and explore potential application for parameter estimation in DCE-MRI based on PBPK-derived AIFs. The PBPK simulations were generated through Simcyp platform and the predicted PK parameters for Gd-DOTA were compared with available clinical data regarding healthy volunteers and renal impairment patients. The assessment of DCE-MRI parameters was implemented by utilizing similar virtual profiles based on gender, age and weight to clinical profiles of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme. The PBPK–derived AIFs were then used to compute DCE-MRI parameters through the Extended Tofts Model and compared with the corresponding ones derived from image-based AIF computation. The comparison involved: (i) image measured AIF of patients vs AIF of in silico profile, and, (ii) population average AIF vs in silico mean AIFs. The results indicate that PBPK–derived AIFs allowed the estimation of comparable imaging biomarkers with those calculated from typical DCE–MRI image analysis. The incorporation of PBPK models and potential utilization of in silico profiles to real patient data, can provide new perspectives in DCE–MRI parameter estimation and data analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988354673&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-016-9493-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27647272; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10928-016-9493-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-016-9493-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10928-016-9493-x
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know