Higher-order theories of gravity matched with large-scale structure and cosmological observations
Journal of Russian Laser Research, ISSN: 1071-2836, Vol: 31, Issue: 2, Page: 129-138
2010
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The so-called f(R)-gravity could, in principle, explain the accelerated expansion of the Universe without adding unknown forms of dark energy/dark matter, but more simply extending the general relativity by generic functions of the Ricci scalar. However, as a part of several phenomenological models, there is no final f(R)-theory capable of fitting all the observations and addressing all the issues related to the presence of dark energy and dark matter. Astrophysical observations are pointing out huge amounts of "dark matter" and "dark energy" needed to explain the observed large-scale structures and cosmic accelerating expansion. Up to now, no experimental evidence has been found, at a fundamental level, to explain such mysterious components. The problem could be completely reversed considering dark matter and dark energy as "shortcomings" of general relativity. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954030240&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10946-010-9132-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know