Convergence Rates of Forward–Douglas–Rachford Splitting Method
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, ISSN: 1573-2878, Vol: 182, Issue: 2, Page: 606-639
2019
- 6Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Over the past decades, operator splitting methods have become ubiquitous for non-smooth optimization owing to their simplicity and efficiency. In this paper, we consider the Forward–Douglas–Rachford splitting method and study both global and local convergence rates of this method. For the global rate, we establish a sublinear convergence rate in terms of a Bregman divergence suitably designed for the objective function. Moreover, when specializing to the Forward–Backward splitting, we prove a stronger convergence rate result for the objective function value. Then locally, based on the assumption that the non-smooth part of the optimization problem is partly smooth, we establish local linear convergence of the method. More precisely, we show that the sequence generated by Forward–Douglas–Rachford first (i) identifies a smooth manifold in a finite number of iteration and then (ii) enters a local linear convergence regime, which is for instance characterized in terms of the structure of the underlying active smooth manifold. To exemplify the usefulness of the obtained result, we consider several concrete numerical experiments arising from applicative fields including, for instance, signal/image processing, inverse problems and machine learning.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064474322&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-019-01524-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303679; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-019-01524-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-019-01524-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10957-019-01524-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know