Thermal management of microelectronic devices using micro-hole cellular structure and nanofluids
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, ISSN: 1588-2926, Vol: 136, Issue: 5, Page: 2171-2182
2019
- 16Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We investigated the thermal performance of micro-hole cellular structure using Al O –H O and CuO–H O nanofluids with 0.67% and 0.4%, respectively, of volumetric concentration numerically and then validated these numerical results with the experimental results at a heating power of 345 W. We found that the thermal conductivities of Al O –H O and CuO–H O nanofluids were enhanced by 2% and 1.19%, respectively, as compared to the base fluid (water). Using Al O –H O nanofluids, we achieved the minimum base temperature of 24.5 °C and 26.6 °C numerically and experimentally, respectively, for the micro-hole cellular structure. Using CuO–H O nanofluids, we achieved the minimum base temperature of 25.5 °C and 27.7 °C numerically and experimentally, respectively. The estimated errors between obtained numerical and experimental results were 8.8% and 8.5% for Al O –H O and CuO–H O, respectively. Experimentally, we achieved the lowest base temperature of 26.6 °C and 27.7 °C using Al O –H O and CuO–H O nanofluids, respectively, which was about 17.6% and 14.5% lower than the reported temperature value of 32.3 °C using water (Tariq et al. in Therm Sci, 2018. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=0354-98361800184T).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055983364&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-018-7852-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know