Fire modulates climate change response of simulated aspen distribution across topoclimatic gradients in a semi-arid montane landscape
Landscape Ecology, ISSN: 1572-9761, Vol: 30, Issue: 6, Page: 1055-1073
2015
- 37Citations
- 545Usage
- 88Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef30
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage545
- Downloads490
- Abstract Views55
- Captures88
- Readers88
- 88
Article Description
Content: Changing aspen distribution in response to climate change and fire is a major focus of biodiversity conservation, yet little is known about the potential response of aspen to these two driving forces along topoclimatic gradients. Objective: This study is set to evaluate how aspen distribution might shift in response to different climate-fire scenarios in a semi-arid montane landscape, and quantify the influence of fire regime along topoclimatic gradients. Methods: We used a novel integration of a forest landscape succession and disturbance model (LANDIS-II) with a fine-scale climatic water deficit approach to simulate dynamics of aspen and associated conifer and shrub species over the next 150 years under various climate-fire scenarios. Results: Simulations suggest that many aspen stands could persist without fire for centuries under current climate conditions. However, a simulated 2–5 °C increase in temperature caused a substantial reduction of aspen coverage at lower elevations and a modest increase at upper elevations, leading to an overall reduction of aspen range at the landscape level. Increasing fire activity may favor aspen increase at its upper elevation limits adjacent to coniferous forest, but may also favor reduction of aspen at lower elevation limits adjacent to xeric shrubland. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of incorporating fine-scale terrain effects on climatic water deficit and ecohydrology when modeling species distribution response to climate change. This modeling study suggests that climate mitigation and adaptation strategies that use fire would benefit from consideration of spatial context at landscape scales.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930276189&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0160-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-015-0160-1; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/aspen_bib/7475; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8469&context=aspen_bib; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/esm_fac/117; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1117&context=esm_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0160-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-015-0160-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10980-015-0160-1; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10980-015-0160-1.pdf
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know