The role of social networks and support in postpartum women's depression: A multiethnic urban sample
Maternal and Child Health Journal, ISSN: 1092-7875, Vol: 10, Issue: 4, Page: 375-383
2006
- 107Citations
- 160Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations107
- Citation Indexes106
- 106
- CrossRef72
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures160
- Readers160
- 160
Article Description
Objectives: This study examined the relationship of social support, and of social networks, to symptoms of depression in a multiethnic sample of women having recently given birth. Methods: Women at community health centers in a Northeastern city were randomly sampled from groups stratified by race/ethnicity (African American, Hispanic, and White) and postpartum interval. Mother's score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CES-D) was the dependent variable. Main independent variables included the Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey and a social network item. Univariate statistics assessed the relationship between CES-D score and each of the independent variables. Multivariate linear regression models included core sociodemographic variables alone, the core model with each of the social support and social network variables separately, and all variables together. We evaluated interactions between race and social support, race and social networks, and social support and social networks. Results: The multivariate models with MOS Social Support and core variables indicated that each 10-point increase in the MOS Social Support Survey was related to a 2.1-unit lower score on the CES-D (95% CI -2.4, -1.7). The inclusion of the social network variable into the core model showed that having two or more friends or family members available was associated with a 13.6-point lower mean score on the CES-D (95% CI -17.5, -9.6), compared to women reporting none or only one available person. Conclusions: Both social support and social networks were statistically significant and independently related to depressive symptomatology. © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33745753584&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16404681; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10995-005-0056-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know