Blockholders and the ESG performance of M&A targets
Journal of Management and Governance, ISSN: 1572-963X, Vol: 28, Issue: 2, Page: 625-650
2024
- 5Citations
- 82Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper investigates the effects that certain characteristics of blockholders have on the environmental and social performance of M&A target firms. First, adopting a counterfactual methodology on a large sample of listed companies, we show the existence of a positive impact of blockholders on target ESG performance. Then, we find that the ESG performance of the target firm does not differ depending on whether the blockholder is a financial or a strategic buyer. This contrasts the general wisdom that the aim of financial acquirors is to maximize short-term profit and so will likely overlook long-term sustainability projects. In addition, acquisitions that are followed by a decrease in leverage are linked to significantly higher ESG performance over the long-term. These results highlight the positive impact of blockholders’ equity investments on environmental and social practices—both strategic and financial. This novel empirical evidence should be valuable to policymakers who wish to define an institutional environment that can speed up sustainable transitions and for investors and managers evaluating M&A deals.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know