The Simplex Algorithm for Best-Estimate of Magnetic Parameters Related to Simple Geometric-Shaped Structures
Mathematical Geosciences, ISSN: 1874-8953, Vol: 47, Issue: 3, Page: 301-316
2015
- 24Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper introduces a practical approach to interpret magnetic anomalies related to simple geometric-shaped models such as thin dike and horizontal cylinder. This approach is mainly based on both the deconvolution technique and on the simplex algorithm for linear programming to best-estimate the model parameters, for example the depth to the top or to the center of a buried structure, the effective magnetization angle and the amplitude coefficient from magnetic anomaly profile. This approach has been tested first on synthetic data sets corrupted by different white Gaussian random noise levels to demonstrate the capability and the reliability of the method. The results acquired show that the estimated parameter values derived by this approach are close to the assumed true values of parameters. The validity of this approach is also demonstrated using real field magnetic anomalies from the United States and Brazil. A comparable and acceptable agreement is shown between the results derived by this approach and those from the real field data information.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84925292009&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know