CO mitigation and renewable oil from photosynthetic microbes: A new appraisal
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, ISSN: 1381-2386, Vol: 12, Issue: 4, Page: 573-608
2007
- 551Citations
- 627Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The only major strategy now being seriously considered for biological mitigation of atmospheric CO relies entirely on terrestrial plants. Photosynthetic microbes were the focus of similar consideration in the 1990s. However, two major government-sponsored research programs in Japan and the USA concluded that the requisite technology was not feasible, and those programs were terminated after investing US$117 million and US$25 million, respectively. We report here on the results of a privately funded US$20 million program that has engineered, built, and successfully operated a commercial-scale (2 ha), modular, production system for photosynthetic microbes. The production system couples photobioreactors with open ponds in a two-stage process - a combination that was suggested, but never attempted - and has operated continuously for several years to produce Haematococcus pluvialis. The annually averaged rate of achieved microbial oil production from H. pluvialis is equivalent to <420 GJ ha yr, which exceeds the most optimistic estimates of biofuel production from plantations of terrestrial "energy crops." The maximum production rate achieved to date is equivalent to 1014 GJ ha yr. We present evidence to demonstrate that a rate of 3200 GJ ha yr is feasible using species with known performance characteristics under conditions that prevail in the existing production system. At this rate, it is possible to replace reliance on current fossil fuel usage equivalent to ∼300 EJ yr - and eliminate fossil fuel emissions of CO of ∼6.5 GtC yr - using only 7.3% of the surplus arable land projected to be available by 2050. By comparison, most projections of biofuels production from terrestrial energy crops would require in excess of 80% of surplus arable land. Oil production cost is estimated at $84/bbl, assuming no improvements in current technology. We suggest enhancements that could reduce cost to $50/bbl or less. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34247366382&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-006-7304-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know