Proteomic analysis of preharvest sprouting in rye using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry
Molecular Breeding, ISSN: 1380-3743, Vol: 30, Issue: 3, Page: 1355-1361
2012
- 8Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef6
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Qualitative and quantitative differences were found between two-dimensional electrophoretic spectra of 546 proteins from two bulked samples of mature rye grain representing: (1) 20 recombinant inbred lines extremely resistant to preharvest sprouting and (2) 20 recombinant inbred lines extremely susceptible to preharvest sprouting. Mass spectrometry of resolved proteins showed that four spots specific for PHS susceptibility represented high molecular weight glutenin subunit, glutathione transferase, 16. 9 kDa heat-shock protein, and monomeric alpha-amylase inhibitor. Two spots specific for PHS resistance contained cytosolic malate dehydrogenase and functionally unrecognized protein with sequence homology to rubber elongation factor protein. Majority of 14 proteins with at least two-fold higher accumulation level in preharvest sprouting susceptible lines relative to that found in sprouting resistant lines, showed sequence homology to proteins involved in defense mechanisms against biotic and abiotic stresses including oxidative stress, and those taking part in energy supply. Two spots were identified as regulatory proteins from the 14-3-3 family with one molecular form prevailing in sprouting susceptible and another form highly accumulated in sprouting resistant lines. Further study establishing map positions of the revealed structural genes in respect to quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting in rye should answer the question on their possible status as candidate genes. © 2012 The Author(s).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866898009&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024596; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11032-012-9721-z
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know