Source-destination discrimination on copy-move forgeries
Multimedia Tools and Applications, ISSN: 1573-7721, Vol: 80, Issue: 8, Page: 12831-12842
2021
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Since digital images are one of the most important carriers of information, their authenticity is quite important. There are miscellaneous forgery techniques for manipulating digital images, and one of those is copy-move forgery. Many forgery detection techniques have been developed for detection of copy-move forgery so far. However, the main lack of these techniques is that although they can successfully detect the copied and pasted regions on a copy-move forgery image, they are not able to determine which of the detected regions is the source region and which of them is the destination region. In this study, a novel and standalone technique has been proposed for source-destination discrimination on copy-move forgery images. The proposed technique is based on machine learning and uses Support Vector Machine. Our technique can be regarded as an appendage for the classical copy-move forgery detection algorithms, which cannot make source-destination discrimination. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed technique is the first standalone technique which makes source-destination discrimination on copy-move forgeries, in the literature, and it is the only successful source-destination discrimination technique in the literature.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104558411&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-020-10436-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know