Decoding comics: a systematic literature review on recognition, segmentation, and classification techniques with emphasis on computer vision and non-computer vision
Multimedia Tools and Applications, ISSN: 1573-7721
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The increasing popularity of digital comics in recent years has drawn substantial interest in comic recognition (CR). CR is a process that includes the automated recognition and extraction of comic panels, speech balloons, and text from comic images and covers a wide range of applications within the digital media sector. This study aims to thoroughly review the existing literature on CR methods and techniques to present all significant findings in recognition techniques, datasets, and comparative evaluations of recognition models. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is conducted using a search strategy that includes various databases, and 60 studies from 2011–2024 are selected. Most of the studies examined for this study use computer vision (CV) techniques for CR, which includes 65% of studies. The remaining 35% of studies have used non-CV techniques. The studies employed segmentation techniques (40%), machine learning (28%), and deep learning (32%). Manga109 and eBDtheque are the most popular public datasets that 78% of the selected studies used. The remaining 22% of the studies built their datasets using existing datasets. The study summarises the findings of the CR research and emphasizes the need to establish uniform standards for accuracy and datasets. It highlights the necessity of investigating and creating hybrid approaches for effective CR operations.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know