Impact of adjuvant fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy dose on local control of brain metastases
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, ISSN: 1573-7373, Vol: 145, Issue: 2, Page: 385-390
2019
- 14Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef3
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether a higher biological effective dose (BED) would result in improved local control in patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for their resected brain metastases. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases without previous brain radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent surgical resection of at least one brain metastasis and were treated with adjuvant FSRT, delivering 25–36 Gy in 5–6 fractions. Outcomes were computed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and univariate analysis. Results: Fifty-four patients with 63 post-operative cavities were included. Median follow-up was 16 months (3–60). Median metastasis size at diagnosis was 2.9 cm (0.6–8.1) and median planning target volume was 19.7 cm (6.3–68.1). Two-year local control (LC) was 83%. When stratified by dose, 2 years LC rate was 95.1% in those treated with 30–36 Gy in 5–6 fractions (BED of 48–57.6 Gy) versus 59.1% lesions treated with 25 Gy in 5 fractions (BED of 37.5 Gy) (p < 0.001). LC was not associated with resection cavity size. One year overall survival was 68.7%, and was independent of BED. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 7.9% of patients and was not associated with dose. Conclusion: In the post-operative setting, high-dose FSRT (BED > 37.5 Gy) were associated with a significantly higher rate of LC compared to lower BED regimens. Overall, 25 Gy in 5 fractions is not an adequate dose to control microscopic disease. If selecting a 5-fraction regimen, 30 Gy in five fractions appears to provide excellent tumor bed control.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075092132&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03308-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606876; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11060-019-03308-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03308-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11060-019-03308-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know