Geotechnical assessment of cut slopes in the landslide-prone Himalayas: rock mass characterization and simulation approach
Natural Hazards, ISSN: 1573-0840, Vol: 104, Issue: 1, Page: 413-435
2020
- 23Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The roadway networks serve as arteries for the ongoing socio-economic activities within the Himalayan region. The perilous conditions of geologically active and fragile terrain are sustained threats to various disasters, including landslides. Large numbers of casualties and fatal incidence associated with landslides are being reported every year. The stability of road cut slopes is a crucial component for safer mobility and transportation activities. To attain a hassle-free and hazard-resilient design along the critical transportation route, a schematic and rigorous geotechnical investigation has been undermined. The present case study was undertaken to envisage cut slope stability and optimal designing of engineered slopes along the national highway-94 (NH-94) from Rishikesh to New Tehri, Garhwal Himalaya, India. The major issues associated with road cut slope failures are getting highlighted. Various rock mass classification systems including rock mass rating (RMR), slope mass rating (SMR) and its extensions, geological strength index, and Q Slope method were used to determine the prevailing stability. Stable slope angle without any reinforcement are suggested for the different probability of failure. Failure pattern was also assessed by applying kinematic analysis. Modified RMR for slopes is suggested by adjusting the orientation factor by using kinematic feasibility. Numerical simulation technique was also applied to determine safety factor. Exponential relationships are derived among Q Slope, SMR, and strength reduction factor. The guidelines to improve safety in terms of landslides are also suggested by considering the outcomes obtained by different methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088267303&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-020-04175-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know