Generalized two-dimensional principal component analysis and two artificial neural network models to detect traveling ionospheric disturbances
Natural Hazards, ISSN: 1573-0840, Vol: 111, Issue: 2, Page: 1245-1270
2022
- 6Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A weak tsunami was induced by the 2016 Mw = 7.8 Sumatra earthquake, which occurred at 12:49 on March 2, 2016 (UTC). The epicenter was at 5.060°S, 94.170°E at a depth of 10 km. At 15.02 on March 2 (UTC), the weak tsunami (amplitude: 0.11 m) arrived at the station located at 10.40°S, 105.67°E. Two largest principal eigenvalues derived using the bilateral projection-based two-dimensional principal component analysis (B2DPCA) indicated a spatial traveling ionospheric disturbance (TID), which was caused by internal gravity waves, at 13:20 on March 2. Two largest principal eigenvalues represented another TID expanding to the southwest. These two TIDs were also determined using two back-propagation neural network (BPNN) models and two convolutional neural network models, called the BPNN-B2DPCA and CNN-B2DPCA methods, respectively. These two methods yielded the same results as the B2DPCA. Therefore, the reliability of B2DPCA was validated.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know