Numerical simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow in the Hongchun gully based on the coupling of the LHT model and the Pudasaini model
Natural Hazards, ISSN: 1573-0840, Vol: 117, Issue: 3, Page: 2553-2572
2023
- 2Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Numerical simulation is an important approach to reproduce debris flow and can help in predicting and assessing the risks of debris flow. In this paper, the landslide hydrodynamic triggering (LHT) model and the Pudasaini model are adopted to simulate the dynamic process of debris flow. The LHT model can reflect the dynamic volume change of shallow landslides due to precipitation and determine the starting location and the starting volume of the debris flow. The Pudasaini model calculates the volume change of the debris flow in the motion process depending on the initial and boundary conditions. The debris flow event that occurred on August 14, 2010, in the Hongchun gully was chosen as an example. The simulation results indicated that the maximum change in landslide volume occurred near 3:00 on the 14th, which corresponds to the actual start time of debris flow. The area and the volume of the predicted deposition zone are slightly greater than the observed values. The high global precision indicates that the simulation is reliable and appropriate for the observation. This means that linking the LHT model to the Pudasaini model can simulate formation, motion, and deposition process of giant debris flow in the Hongchun gully. This is an efficient method for simulating debris flow under rainfall conditions.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know